| https://akurasu.net/downloads/Mazin_head.png | Come hang out with us in the Discord server.
Account creation is disabled due to spam. If you want to help out on the Wiki, poke us in on our Discord server in #wiki. Please consider supporting the site with the PlayAsia referral links here or via the donate buttons in the sidebar, it really does help. | https://akurasu.net/downloads/Flonne_cheer.png |
Talk:Super Robot Wars/Z/Secrets: Difference between revisions
→Rubys -- Daichi 20:55, 8 November 2008 (PST): scenario numbers |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yeah, this page is kinda big. Rubies are cool and all, but the Firefox extension is very slow compared to IE's native Ruby viewing. Firefox really lags while trying to render Ruby tags with all the tables. Maybe we could cut back on what really needs them, (like the scenario numbers,) I dunno. Also, note the new threaded discussion extension I just added. | Yeah, this page is kinda big. Rubies are cool and all, but the Firefox extension is very slow compared to IE's native Ruby viewing. Firefox really lags while trying to render Ruby tags with all the tables. Maybe we could cut back on what really needs them, (like the scenario numbers,) I dunno. Also, note the new threaded discussion extension I just added. | ||
===Re: Rubys -- [[User:MagentaGalaxy|Magenta Galaxy]] 21:04, 8 November 2008 (PST)=== | |||
: That can definitely be done, no worries. A lot of this was a copy-paste job for speed of completion, which means a lot of Ruby tags that needed to be in for the chart (due to the gaps between steps) can probably be cut from the actual written requirements. If we move the chart itself off onto a seperate page, that could also help - there's no links TO the chart, only FROM it, so moving the chart away from the page (onto /Z/Secrets_Chart perhaps?) would require absolutely no recoding. We could then trim some unnecessary Ruby from the chart - via scenario numbers - and from the written text - via repetitive Ruby - and make it all a lot quicker | |||
Revision as of 22:04, 8 November 2008
I think this article should be divided into seperate articles covering units, characters, and items and attacks. Kouban 08:59, 8 November 2008 (PST)
As Netmonmatt put it while we're discussing it, "there's nothing worse than having to refer to multiple places for the same information". I'm not against maybe putting the actual textual information into seperate pages, but I think the chart at very least needs to remain as a singular resource. Magenta Galaxy 15:34, 8 November 2008 (PST)
Rubys -- Daichi 20:55, 8 November 2008 (PST)
Yeah, this page is kinda big. Rubies are cool and all, but the Firefox extension is very slow compared to IE's native Ruby viewing. Firefox really lags while trying to render Ruby tags with all the tables. Maybe we could cut back on what really needs them, (like the scenario numbers,) I dunno. Also, note the new threaded discussion extension I just added.
Re: Rubys -- Magenta Galaxy 21:04, 8 November 2008 (PST)
- That can definitely be done, no worries. A lot of this was a copy-paste job for speed of completion, which means a lot of Ruby tags that needed to be in for the chart (due to the gaps between steps) can probably be cut from the actual written requirements. If we move the chart itself off onto a seperate page, that could also help - there's no links TO the chart, only FROM it, so moving the chart away from the page (onto /Z/Secrets_Chart perhaps?) would require absolutely no recoding. We could then trim some unnecessary Ruby from the chart - via scenario numbers - and from the written text - via repetitive Ruby - and make it all a lot quicker
